Ribonuclear inclusions as biomarker of myotonic dystrophy type 2, even in improperly frozen or defrozen skeletal muscle biopsies

Published: 17 August 2009
Abstract Views: 860
PDF: 591
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is a dominantly inherited disorder caused by a CCTG repeat expansion in intron 1 of ZNF9 gene. The size and the somatic instability of DM2 expansion complicate the molecular diagnosis of DM2. In situ hybridization represents a rapid and sensitive method to obtain a definitive diagnosis in few hours, since it allows the direct visualization of the mutant mRNA foci on skeletal muscle sections. This approach makes the muscle biopsy an important tool for definitive diagnosis of DM2. Consequently, a rapid freezing at ultra cold temperature and a good storage of muscle specimens are essential to avoid morphologic alterations and nucleic acids degradation. However incorrect freezing or thawing may accidentally occur. In this work we report that fluorescence in situ hybridization may be applied on improperly frozen or inappropriately stored muscle biopsies since foci of mutant mRNA are well preserved and can still be detected in muscle sections no more useful for histopathological evaluation.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Cardani, R., Mancinelli, E., Giagnacovo, M., Sansone, V., & Meola, G. (2009). Ribonuclear inclusions as biomarker of myotonic dystrophy type 2, even in improperly frozen or defrozen skeletal muscle biopsies. European Journal of Histochemistry, 53(2), e13. https://doi.org/10.4081/ejh.2009.e13

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
57%
33%
Days to publication 
0
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A