Immunohistochemical detection of C-100 hepatitis C virus antigen in formaldehyde-fixed paraffin-embedded liver tissue. Correlation with serum, tissue and in situ RT-PCR results

Published: 29 June 2009
Abstract Views: 518
PDF: 634
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

We localized HCV C-100 protein in liver biopsies of 15 patients with chronic hepatitis C using immunohistochemistry. The results were compared to serum, tissue extract analysis of HCV RNA and in situ RT-PCR described in a previous study. HCV was detected in 80% of the sera tested, in 40% of the tissue extracts and in 80% and 60% of the tissue sections tested by immunohistochemistry and in situ RTPCR respectively. Compared to the serum positive cases, 83% and 67% of the cases were respectively positive with immunohistochemistry and in situ RT-PCR and 41% were positive with tissue extract detection. Compared to the tissue extract positive cases, 25% and 50% of the cases were respectively positive with immunohistochemistry and in situ RT-PCR. Finally, 75% of the cases positive by immunohistochemistry were also positive by in situ RT-PCR. These results underline the complementarity of the different methods for the precise diagnosis of hepatitis C.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Benkoël, L., Biagini, P., Dodero, F., De Lamballerie, X., De Micco, P., Chamlian, A., & Lombardo, D. (2009). Immunohistochemical detection of C-100 hepatitis C virus antigen in formaldehyde-fixed paraffin-embedded liver tissue. Correlation with serum, tissue and in situ RT-PCR results. European Journal of Histochemistry, 48(2), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.4081/886

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
57%
33%
Days to publication 
0
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A