DNA aberrations in urinary bladder cancer detected by flow cytometry and fish: prognostic implications

Published: 24 December 2009
Abstract Views: 2271
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

We evaluated the genetic changes in bladder cancer biopsy by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and related them to stage and grade of the tumor, ploidy (FCM) and clinical outcome, to determine a simple method to identify tumors with a poorer prognosis. Using FISH the numerical aberrations of chromosomes 1,7,9,17 in tumor’s imprints of 70 patients with transitional cell cancer (TCC) were determined. First of all, the data demonstrated that the sensitivity of FISH in detecting quantitative DNA aberrations exceeds FCM’s sensitivity. The frequency of chromosome 1 and 9 aberrations did not show significant differences in diploid and aneuploid tumors in different stage and grade. On the contrary, the chromosome 7 and 17 aneusomy showed greater differences between pT1 and pT2-3 tumors (p<0.032 and p<0.0006, respectively) than between stage pTa and pT1. In our investigation, an increasing number of aberrations was observed in all chromosomes examined in tumors of patients who afterwards underwent cystectomy and/or had recurrent tumors. These results suggest that chromosome 7 and 17 aneusomy could be predictive of adverse outcome in a subgroup of patients with superficial tumors at presentation.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Cianciulli, A., Bovani, R., Leonardo, C., Iori, F., Coletta, A., Marzano, R., … Laurenti, C. (2009). DNA aberrations in urinary bladder cancer detected by flow cytometry and fish: prognostic implications. European Journal of Histochemistry, 45(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.4081/ejh.2001.1615

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
57%
33%
Days to publication 
0
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A